A review of the Icom IC-7300 direct RF sampling transceiver
In August 2015 at the Tokyo Hamfair, Icom debuted a new type of
transceiver in their product line––one featuring a direct RF
sampling receiver. Essentially, it was an SDR tabletop transceiver.
At about the same time that the IC-7300 started shipping around the
world, Icom pulled their venerable IC-7200 off the market. Yet the
IC-7200 was established as a well-loved product, due to its highly
sensitive receiver, its relatively robust front end, and its quality
audio. Moreover, it was simple to operate, which made superb as a Field
Day or radio club rig.
Therefore, even though the IC-7300 promised much more versatility than
the IC-7200, for its price point it had a tough act to follow.
So, of course––even more so than with any other radio Icom has
introduced in the past few years––I was eager to get my hands on a
IC-7300. I’m very fortunate that my good friend, Dave Anderson (K4SV)
was one of the first purchasers of the IC-7300, and that he didn’t
mind (after only having the rig perhaps one week!) allowing me to borrow
it for a several weeks for evaluation.
Note: I should state here that since this rig was loaned to me, I
evaluated it based on the firmware version it shipped with, and made no
modifications to it.
This review primarily focuses on the receiver’s performance,
functionality and usability.
Introducing the Icom IC-7300
In recent years, the “big three” ham radio manufacturers have been
using color displays, and––Icom most especially––touch screens.
While I’m no fan of backlit touch screens in mobile applications, I
think touch screen displays make a lot of sense in a base radio. If
carefully designed, a touch screen can save an operator from
heavily-buried menus and decrease the number of multi-function buttons
on the front panel.
The challenge, of course, is making a display with intuitive controls,
and one that is large enough, and with sufficient resolution, to be
useful to the operator. In the past, I’ve been disappointed by many
displays; the most successful have been incorporated in DX/Contest-class
(i.e., pricier) transceivers, meanwhile, entry-level and mid-priced
transceiver displays often seem half-baked. While the graphics may be
crisp, spectrum displays at this price point are often too compressed to
be useful, and if not a touch display, force the user to pause operation
in order to find the correct knob or button to change settings. In such
cases, I find myself wondering why the manufacturer went to the expense
of a color display at all––?
But what about the C-7300 display? I’m thoroughly pleased to report
that Icom did a fantastic job of balancing utility and function in
design of the IC-7300’s color touch display and front panel. There are
number of ways you can chose to display and arrange elements on the
screen–since I’m an SDR fan, I typically chose a display setting
which gave the waterfall the most real estate. Of course, one can chose
to give the frequency display priority or a number of other
arrangements.
User interface
I can tell that Icom built upon their experience with the
IC-7100––their first entry-level touch screen display transceiver.
I was able to get the IC-7300 on the air in very little time. Within
five minutes of turning on the IC-7300, I was able to:
change the display to feature a spectrum waterfall; change the span
of the
waterfall display; adjust the TX power output;
change the filters
selection and the transmit mode; change bands and make direct-frequency
entries; adjust notch, passband, and filter width; adjust AF and RF
gain; set A/B VFOs and operate split; change AGC settings; turn on Noise
Reduction/Noise Blanker, and adjust compression. Basically, I found that
all the essential functions are clearly laid out, accessible, and highly
functional. Impressive.
The IC-7300 ships with a manual–– aptly titled, the “Basic”
manual––and a CD with the full and unabridged operations manual. The
Basic Manual covers a great deal a lot more than the manual which
accompanied the Icom ID-51a. If you read through the manual, you’ll
readily familiarize yourself with most of the IC-7300’s higher
function operations, and especially, you’ll be able to adjust the
settings to your operation style. The Manual is written in simple
language, and includes a lot of diagrams and graphics.
If you’re like me, you will find you’ll also need to reference that
unabridged manual, so hang on to the CD, too.
Still, I imagine there’s a large percentage of future IC-7300 owners
that will never need to reference the manual––especially if they
don’t care about tweaking band edges or similar settings. Yes, believe
it or not, it’s that easy to use.
Operation
While I spent a great deal of time listening to CW and SSB in various
band conditions and at various times of day, I spent less time on the
air transmitting.
With that said, all of my transmitting time was in CW since the IC-7300
mic was accidentally left out when my friend loaned me the rig.
I’m please to report that CW operation is quite pleasant. All of the
adjustments––RF Power, Key Speed, and CW Pitch––can be quickly
modified using the multi-function knob.
While in CW mode, you can also
toggle full break-in mode, which is quite smooth, via the function
button and touch screen.
SSB functions are similar. While in SSB mode, the multi-function
knob
allows you to change the tx power, mic gain, and monitor level. The
function button opens an on-screen menu with VOX, compression, TBW, and
the monitor toggle.
Here’s a short video I made with my phone while I made a few
adjustments to the IC-7300:
Of course, my smartphones’s microphone can’t accurately reproduce
the audio from the IC-7300, but you probably get the idea.
The only annoyance I noted––and perhaps I’m more sensitive to
this, being primarily a QRPer––is that the 7300’s cooling fan
starts up each time you key up. It even comes on when transmit power is
at its lowest setting. I find this a little distracting in CW.
Fortunately, however, the 7300’s fan is fairly quiet and operates
smoothly.
Receiver performance summary
I enjoy producing audio clips for readers to compare and comment upon.
Each time I’ve done so in the past, I’ve had listeners argue the
virtues of a particular audio clip while others have the complete
opposite reaction to that same clip. Not all of us prefer our audio
served up in the same way. No doubt, there’s a great deal of
subjectivity in this sort of test.
I’ve had the IC-7300 on the air every day since I took possession of
it. I’ve listened to SSB, CW, and lots of AM/SW broadcasters.
And here’s my summary: the IC-7300 is an excellent receiver. It has a
low noise floor, superb sensitivity and excellent selectivity. I even
slightly prefer its audio to that of my Elecraft KX3, and I’m a huge
fan of the little KX3.
I’ve written before about how difficult it is to compare SDRs; the
problem is that there are so many ways to tweak your audio, filters,
AGC, noise reduction, etc. that it’s hard to compare apples with
apples.
In the audio samples above, the IC-7300 and WinRadio Excalibur were both
set to their default audio settings. In SSB and CW, the IC-7300 excels,
in my opinion. CW seems to pop out of the noise better and SSB is more
pleasant and interpretable. The Excalibur has a better audio profile for
AM broadcasters,
though. Its default audio simply sounds fuller–more
robust.
The audio from the IC-7300 on AM sounded absolutely
flat. However, if I
tweak the audio of the ‘7300, adding more bass, it instantly sounds
more like a dedicated tabletop receiver.
I should also mention that while the IC-7300’s built-in digital
recording is a fantastic and effective feature, it doesn’t produce
audio true to what’s heard through headphones live. This iis
especially the case
when you add more bass and treble response as in the RRI
example above. When the audio EQ is set to a default flat,
it’s quite
accurate.
To be clear: for broadcast listening, I’ll still reach for my SDRs
(the Excalibur, FDM-S2, TitanSDR and CR-1a).
If, however, I have limited space and/or budget for multiple receivers,
I’d be quite happy using the IC-7300 as a broadcast receiver on the HF
bands.
Speaking from the Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) perspective, meanwhile,
am I pleased with how the ‘7300 handles the broadcast bands? Most
definitely.
And as a ham radio operator, am I pleased with the IC-7300’s
receiver––? Absolutely.
In short: the IC-7300 seems to have some of the best all-around receiver
qualities of any transceiver I know under $2,000.
Summary
Every radio has its pros and cons. When I begin a review of a radio, I
take notes of my initial impressions. Here’s my list for the IC-7300:
Pros
*Excellent sensitivity and selectivity
*Excellent, highly-customizable RX and TX audio
*Color touch screen interface
*Spectrum display is large enough to be useful Intuitive functions
*Twin PBT is both intuitive to operate and effective
*Effective RF gain to compensate for noisy band conditions
*Built-in RX and TX recording, file transfers via common SD card
*Front panel knobs and buttons are spaced appropriately and easy to use
*Quiet cooling fan (see con)
*Decodes RTTY on screen
*Built-in ATU
*Antenna analyzer function (not tested)
Cons
*Lacks
secondary receive antenna jack on rear panel
*Cooling fan immediately starts up on CW/SSB transmit at any power setting
(see pro
regarding fan noise)
*Occasionally you may get lost in deeper
customized functions
*Supplied printed basic owner’s manual, while well-written, doesn’t fully
cover the IC-7300s functions and
options; you must explore the digital owner’s manual in supplied CD.
Conclusion
In a nutshell: Icom has hit a home run with the IC-7300. If I didn’t
already have an Elecraft KX3 and K2, I would buy the IC-7300 without
hesitation.
Though the price point is a little high for an “entry level
transceiver,” it’s
worth every penny, in my opinion. For $1500 US,
you get a fantastic general-coverage
transceiver with an intuitive
interface, nearly every function you can imagine, and performance
that would please even a seasoned DXer.
Though
I haven’t done and A/B comparison with the IC-7200, I imagine
the IC-7300 would prevail in a test. The IC-7300 would certainly wipe
the floor with it’s more economical brother, the IC-718.
Radio clubs, take note: If your club is considering a transceiver upgrade or
purchase, do
seriously consider the IC-7300. I think you’ll find this rig is up to
the task.
And for home? The Icom IC-7300 may be all of the rig you’ll ever need.
Thank you for all the reception reports sent to
reports@digidx.uk.
Sorry
for the problem during the 15770kHz broadcast at 2130 on Sunday, as
anyone who tuned in will know the broadcast stopped after about 10
minutes and was replaced by music, WRMI are looking into why their
automated systems did this.
Reception reports gave lots of good feedback regarding the Olivia mode
tests and the QR code tests. However most people did have trouble
decoding the QR codes, it seems that with a certain level of distortion
on the image it would not decode. The QR codes images being quite
complicated due to the amount of text being encoded did not help either.
Only a few people managed to successfully decode both
codes - Richard
Langley, Roger
(http://www.rhci-online.net/radiogram/VoA_Radiogram_2016-05-14.htm#DIGIDX)
Klaus Fuchs and Merkouris who gave some details on how he managed to
get them both to decode even with some noise on the image:
“While the first image refused to decode, the second one decoded
swiftly by the TWMobile QR Code Reader installed on my smartphone. I
also tried to decode the images via the
zxing.org online decoder but
both of them were not recognized. Then I decided to clarify the first
image by removing some noise, hoping for a better result. After applying
the Despeckle command available in the PaintShop Pro image editing
software, the image decoded, though not as fast as the other one”.
On the Olivia mode tests most people had good decodes of all 3 modes but
where there was a difference between decoding in most cases Olivia
16-500 lead to the best code. Rafael Martinez from Spain had a perfect
decode of the Olivia 16-500 despite a large amount of local noise on the
49m band. Listen to a clip of the audio he recorded here -
https://tmblr.co/Z2ABWh26hG4v2. If you play this
audio
you should be
able to decode some of the Olivia 16-500 text on 1500Hz using FlDigi,
Tivar on Android, MultiPSK or similar.
Jawahar Almeida who is working on a ship with a route of Santa Marta –
Colombia, Moin – Costa Rica and Wilmington, DE (USA) and was in Costa
Rica at the time of the 2330 11580kHz broadcast also had a bad decode of
the MFSK32 but then said “I had to guess when you shifted modes and so
after OLIVIA 64-2K I switched to OLIVIA32-1K and could decode again.
Thereafter it was clear all the way.” He also concluded “Olivia
16-500 seemed to work the best.”
Now follows this weeks E-QSL card, sent as an MFSK32 image.
Sending Pic:399x228;
|
|